next up previous contents
Next: A Conjecture About Nonvanishing Up: VISUALIZING MORDELL-WEIL GROUPS OF Previous: Restriction of Scalars   Contents


Visibility Theory

Suppose $ \iota: A\hookrightarrow{}R$ is a closed immersion of abelian varieties over a number field $ L$. The visible subgroup of $ {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/L)$ with respect to $ \iota$ is

$\displaystyle \Vis_R({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}...
...ding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(R/L)).
$

The following theorem can sometimes be used to prove that $ \Vis_R({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/L))$ is nontrivial. We will use it later to construct nontrivial elements of Shafarevich-Tate groups in Section 6. For an alternative approach which uses étale cohomology, see Section 8.

Theorem 3.1   Let $ A$ and $ B$ be abelian subvarieties of an abelian variety $ R$ over a number field $ L$ such that $ A\cap B$ is finite, and suppose that $ A(L)$ is finite. Let $ N$ be an integer divisible by the residue characteristics of primes of bad reduction for $ R$. Suppose $ p$ is a prime such that $ e<p-1$, where $ e$ is the largest ramification of any prime of $ L$ lying over $ p$, and that

$\displaystyle p\nmid N \cdot \char93 (R/B)(L)\cdot\char93 B(L)_{\tor}\cdot
\prod_{v} c_{A,v}\cdot c_{B,v},$

where $ c_{A,v} = \char93 \Phi_{A,v}(\mathbb{F}_\ell)$ (resp., $ c_{B,\ell}$) is the Tamagawa number of $ A$ (resp., $ B$) at $ v$. Suppose furthermore that $ B[p] \subset A$, where both are viewed as subgroups of $ R(\overline{L})$. Then there is an isomorphism

$\displaystyle B(L)/pB(L)\cong \Vis_R({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/L)[p]).$

Remark 3.2   Everything divides infinity, so if $ (R/B)(\mathbb{Q})$ is infinite, then no primes satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem.

Proof. [1, Thm. 3.1] produces an embedding

$\displaystyle B(L)/p B(L)\hookrightarrow \Vis_R({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A)[p]).
$

That theorem is proved using a standard snake lemma argument to show that $ B(L)/p B(L)\hookrightarrow \Vis_R(H^1(L,A))$, combined with a local analysis at each prime to see that $ B(L)$ lands in $ {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/L)$. To prove that this embedding is surjective, note that the index of $ E(\mathbb{Q})$ in $ R(\mathbb{Q})$ is finite and coprime to $ p$. $ \qedsymbol$


next up previous contents
Next: A Conjecture About Nonvanishing Up: VISUALIZING MORDELL-WEIL GROUPS OF Previous: Restriction of Scalars   Contents
William A Stein 2002-02-27