next up previous contents
Next: What Goes Wrong when Up: Applications Previous: Existence of Elements of   Contents

The Possible Orders of Shafarevich-Tate Groups

On page 306-307 of [10], Tate discusses results about the structure of the group $ {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/K)$, where $ A$ is an abelian variety over a number field $ K$. He asserts that if $ A$ is a Jacobian then $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/K)$ is a perfect square. Poonen and Stoll subsequently pointed out in [8] that Tate's assertion is not quite correct. In fact, Poonen and Stoll prove that when $ A$ is a Jacobian, $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/K)$ is either a square or twice a square, and they give examples in which $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/K)$ is twice a square. Tate does not discuss the case when $ A$ is not a Jacobian, except to mention results that imply that $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/K)$ is square away from $ 2$ and primes that don't divide the degree of some polarization of $ A$.

Now suppose $ A$ is an arbitrary abelian variety over a number field $ K$. In this case, it has remained an unresolved problem during the last $ 35$ years to decide whether or not $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/K)$ is a square or twice a square. Let $ E$ be an elliptic curve over  $ \mathbb{Q}$ of rank $ 1$. Then the construction of the present paper gives, for suitable primes $ p$, an injection

$\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}\approx E(\mathbb{Q})/p E(\mathbb{Q}) \hook...
...2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q}),$

where $ A$ is an abelian variety over  $ \mathbb{Q}$ which is a twist of $ E^{\times p-1}$. Thus $ {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})[p]$ has a ``natural'' subgroup of order $ p$; moreover, no other natural subgroup of order $ p$ presents itself. Is $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})[p]\approx \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$? If the answer is yes for even a single $ p>2$, then the question of whether or not $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})$ must be a square or twice a square is finally resolved. We make the following contribution toward settling this problem.

Proposition 7.2   Let $ E$ be the unique elliptic curve over  $ \mathbb{Q}$ of conductor $ 43$. Let $ K=\mathbb{Q}(\mu_7)^+$ be the real subfield of $ \mathbb{Q}(\mu_7)$, let $ R=\Res_{K/\mathbb{Q}}E_K$, and let $ A = \ker\left(R \rightarrow E\right).$ Then $ 3\mid \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})$ and the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture implies that $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})[3]=3$ and $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(R/\mathbb{Q})[3]=1$.

Proof. We first verify that the BSD conjecture predicts that $ \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(E/K)[3]=1$. Because $ K/\mathbb{Q}$ is abelian,

$\displaystyle L(E_K,s) = L(E,s)\cdot L(E,\chi,s)\cdot L(E,\chi^{-1},s),$

where $ \chi:(\mathbb{Z}/7\mathbb{Z})^*\rightarrow \mu_3$ is a Dirichlet character of order $ 3$. For each of the three real places $ v$ of $ K$, we have $ \Omega_{E,v}=\Omega_{E/\mathbb{Q}}$. Next observe that

$\displaystyle E(\mathbb{Q})\otimes \mathbb{Z}_3 \rightarrow E(K)\otimes \mathbb{Z}_3$

is surjective, because

$\displaystyle \frac{E(K)}{E(\mathbb{Q})} = \frac{R(\mathbb{Q})}{E(\mathbb{Q})}
\hookrightarrow (R/E)(\mathbb{Q})_{\tor}$

and $ (R/E)(\mathbb{Q})[3]=\{0\}$ by Proposition 5.2. If $ P\in E(\mathbb{Q})$ then

$\displaystyle \langle P, P\rangle_\mathbb{Q}= \frac{1}{[K:\mathbb{Q}]} \langle P, P \rangle_K,$

so $ \Reg(E/K) \sim 3\cdot \Reg(E/\mathbb{Q})$, where $ \sim$ denotes ``equality up to a number coprime to $ 3$''. By Proposition 5.2, $ E(K)_{\tor}[3]=\{0\}$ and $ 3\nmid c_v$ for places $ v$ of  $ \mathbb{Q}$ (because this is true for $ R$). Finally,

$\displaystyle \char93 {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(E/K)$ $\displaystyle = \frac{L'(E_K,1)\cdot \char93 E(K)_{\tor}^2} {\Reg(E/K)\cdot\Omega_{E/\mathbb{Q}}^3\cdot \prod_{v} c_{v}}$    
  $\displaystyle \sim \frac{L'(E,1)}{3\cdot \Reg(E/\mathbb{Q}) \cdot \Omega_E} \cdot \Norm_{\mathbb{Q}(\mu_3)/\mathbb{Q}}\left(\frac{L(E,\chi,1)}{\Omega_E}\right)$    
  $\displaystyle = \frac{1}{3}\cdot 3=1.$    

We verified the last nontrivial equality with a computer using standard modular symbols techniques.

We have an exact sequence

$\displaystyle 0 \rightarrow \Vis({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\f...
...fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(R/\mathbb{Q})[3].$

Since

$\displaystyle {\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontsh...
...2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(E/K)[3]=\{0\},$

$\displaystyle E(\mathbb{Q})/3 E(\mathbb{Q})\hookrightarrow \Vis({\mbox{{\fonten...
...ontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})[3]),$

and $ \Vis({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})[3])$ is a surjective image of $ R(\mathbb{Q})\otimes \mathbb{Z}_3 = E(K)\otimes \mathbb{Z}_3$, which, as mentioned above, is a surjective image of $ E(\mathbb{Q})\otimes \mathbb{Z}_3=\mathbb{Z}_3$, it follows that

$\displaystyle \Vis({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(A/\mathbb{Q})[3])=\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}.$

$ \qedsymbol$


next up previous contents
Next: What Goes Wrong when Up: Applications Previous: Existence of Elements of   Contents
William A Stein 2002-02-27