Villegas: If you say that the curve has rank
and look at regulator
in terms of
-function, then look at BSD, then big
imply
small regulator hence small height. If you believe that the
-function is essentially constant....
Mazur: In rank 2 case, what is ratio between shortest and second shortest.
Weissman: Higher dimensional? S. David. Can formulate an analogue for
abelian varieties, but I don't know much so I shouldn't summarize.
See Number Theory III, by Lang.
Elkies:
Thanks! The four examples you list are quite remarkable also for having
lots of integer points: sixteen pairs on each of the top two examples
(#1: 1-21 except 8,11,13,16,17; #2: 1-18 except 10,11,17 and also 21);
fourteen on #3 (1-18 except 7,11,13,14), and fifteen on #4
(1-15 except 8,13, and also 18 and 25). In each case I don't claim
that my list is complete--I looked only up to 50 and certainly didn't
attempt a proof that there aren't yet more integer multiples, though
for rank 1 it's reasonably straightforward to do in practice. Anyway,
these examples beat the best I that I could find in the
tables,
where there were never more than 12 integral pairs, and the largest
multiple was 24P for 735F. For consecutive integer points, the curve
618F
ties your record of nine for 3630Y. I suspect that you might find
even more such examples by setting a more generous limit on the height
and looking specifically for many integral multiples, for integral
with
large, or for many consecutive multiples (could there be a case
where
is integral for each
in
?).
Update:
is realized by the point
on the curve
of conductor
.
The point
is also integral.
The largest integral multiple I can find for now is
, for
,
(whose first
multiples, and
,
,
, are also integral).
Acknowledgement: It is a pleasure to thank Matt Baker for giving
a really cool talk, the people who made comments above, and John Cremona for
computing a table of regulators of elliptic curves.